The Coast News Group
Despite his claim of “blatant political gerrymandering,” former Councilman Mark Muir, center, lost his re-election bid in 2018. Graphic by Jordan P. Ingram
Cities Community Encinitas Encinitas Featured News

District map quagmire rekindled in Encinitas with fresh misconduct claims

ENCINITAS — A looming electoral redistricting process coupled with last month’s District 3 appointment of Councilwoman Joy Lyndes to the Encinitas City Council has renewed old feelings of suspicion and betrayal among residents who still feel the city’s initial districting was nothing short of a fiasco.

Some critics, including former office-holders, maintain the city’s transition from citywide to district elections was less than transparent and tainted with secret maps and gerrymandering, leading to the ouster of a conservative councilman and helping to solidify Mayor Catherine Blakespear’s leftward influence over the council.

And a recent utterance from an Encinitas representative only reignited long-smoldering embers of voter discontent over the city’s electoral changeover, leading to fresh allegations of official misconduct.

“We know why that part of the city is in District 3, it’s because Mark (Muir) lived, you know, over there, and we wanted to make sure that every council member wasn’t competing against one another,” Councilman Tony Kranz said during a Feb. 24 meeting.

Specifically, Kranz’s remarks sparked outrage among residents online who allege the councilman’s comments revealed a collective knowledge among council members to rig the districting process in favor of Democrats.

These claims have raised questions, such as whether sitting council members violated California’s Brown Act, a “sunshine” law requiring local government business to be conducted at open and public meetings.

According to the law: “A majority of the members of a legislative body shall not, outside a meeting authorized by this chapter, use a series of communications of any kind, directly or through intermediaries, to discuss, deliberate, or take action on any item of business that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body.”

Blakespear did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Origins

In 2017, the city of Encinitas was under threat of legal action from Malibu-based attorney Kevin Shenkman to transition from at-large to by-district elections.

Shenkman and others used the California Voting Rights Act to disrupt political systems in numerous cities across the state, forcing municipalities into district-based elections with the intention of rooting out discriminatory voting practices and improving minority representation primarily for Latinos (In Encinitas, the Hispanic population has remained steady at roughly 14% as of 2019, and is spread out across the entire city).

Since then, analysis suggests that by-district elections had minimal effect statewide helping minority communities receive better representation. The Los Angeles Times reported fewer than one-third of the cities that switched to districts in response to litigation demands between June 2016 and April 2017 saw an increase in minority representation.

To sidestep a costly legal battle, the City of Encinitas requested anonymous map submissions of districting proposals. Planning Commissioner Kevin Doyle felt the idea to switch to district elections was an “awful idea.”

“We must ensure that the future councils won’t be able to gerrymander districts to their liking,” Doyle said in an article by the San Diego Union-Tribune. “Good luck with that, but it must be foolproof.”

Doyle’s remark was a warning, premonition or both. After receiving more than 20 prototypes from residents and staff, city officials selected finalists, including two maps labeled “Citizens 15” and “Citizens 16.”

The “Citizens 16” map divided the city into four quadrants. But it was one quartile — District 3 — that quickly became problematic. The map looks like a crooked finger stretching from Cardiff-by-the-Sea into neighborhoods of both New and Old Encinitas.

Citizens Map 16
The Encinitas City Council voted 3-2 on Nov. 8, 2017, to select “Citizens Map 16” as the new electoral map. But from the beginning, residents and city officials raised concerns about gerrymandering. Courtesy photo

The Coast News later discovered via public records request that former Councilwoman Tasha Boerner Horvath had drawn and submitted both “Citizens 15” and “Citizens 16,” a detail she chose not to disclose to the council or residents until after the story broke.

Boerner Horvath explained her decision to remain anonymous was to allow the council to review the maps based on their individual attributes and “how they fulfilled our goals that we have set forth in this districting process.”

As previously reported by The Coast News, Boerner Horvath further defended her actions by noting that just months earlier, the Poway City Council set a precedent when it chose as its final map one created by Mayor Steve Vaus, who did not disclose it during a hearing when his map was selected as a finalist.

Boerner Horvath did not provide a comment for this article.

For some, it wasn’t a coincidence the council’s final two maps were drawn by Boerner Horvath. At the time, Blakespear said she didn’t believe Boerner Horvath had an obligation to disclose it, noting her maps “came from a place of knowledge” because the future state assemblywoman frequently walked the entire city.

Despite rumblings of gerrymandering, secret drawings and cover-ups, the council adopted “Citizens 16” as the map for future district elections.

Fallout

Former Councilman Mark Muir, a longtime conservative, suddenly found himself within a sliver of creative cartography that defined a portion of District 3.

For Muir and many others, the drawing had all the signs of a gerrymandered district. Muir lives in Old Encinitas, but District 3 consisted mostly of Cardiff residents.

And not just a little bit — Cardiff residents outnumber New and Old Encinitas residents 2 to 1, according to the city’s District 3 address list.

The number of Cardiff-by-the-Sea residents compared with those living in Old Encinitas in District 3 is greater than 2 to 1, according to the city’s District 3 address list. Cardiff and Old Encinitas residents were differentiated by ZIP code (Source: City of Encinitas). Graphic by Dan Brendel

Kranz also recently acknowledged the map did not favor Muir or any District 3 candidate residing outside of Cardiff.

“There’s no question (the map) made it more of a challenge for someone that lived in that panhandled part of the district,” Kranz said.

For Muir, who described himself to The Coast News recently as happily retired, the whole situation appeared to be a coordinated effort to remove conservative-leaning council members.

“Oh yeah, absolutely I had that sense in the very beginning,” Muir told The Coast News. “Firstly, it was done secretively. They only admit to it when they get busted. And the way the votes came out, how it was handled, conversations that took place, led me to believe it was (a group effort). I’d be surprised if three people didn’t know about it.”

“There are too many indicators that look as if it’s a Brown Act violation,” he continued. “But you can’t prove it. At the time, I made the assumption, but I couldn’t prove it. It’s just the way it is. If it looks like it’s happening, sounds like it’s happening and you see indicators it’s happening, it’s probably happening.”

Pam Slater Price, a former Encinitas Mayor and County Supervisor, told The Coast News she would “second Muir’s” sentiments, noting that none of the council members raised strenuous objections or voted against the adoption of the maps drawn by Boerner Horvath.

“I think that Mark himself knows that he was districted out of his base,” Slater-Price said. “The whole thing just reeks of insider dealing. I don’t know how else to describe it. This entire council seems to be dominated by the mayor and her perspective. All but Kranz have been originally appointed by (Blakespear). To have no diverse viewpoints on the council is unhealthy and yet this is how this particular council is being run.”

Political Games?

Kranz said he is not in favor of keeping District 3’s “funky shape,” and he would like to rectify the situation by returning to at-large elections or, at the very least, hiring an independent agency to redraw the district maps.

“It’s more important to me, whether we feel it’s necessary to make changes to the district boundaries, to more closely replicate the five communities that were established as part of incorporation,” Kranz said.

The Encinitas City Council bids farewell to outgoing Councilman Mark Muir in 2018 following his electoral loss to Councilwoman Jody Hubbard for the District 3 council seat. Hubbard resigned in Jan. 2021 due to advanced lung cancer and was replaced by Councilwoman Joy Lyndes. Photo by James Wang

Kranz denied having personal foreknowledge of the maps and did not believe other council members had collective knowledge, but he acknowledged the city has shifted slightly further to the left in recent years.

“I would say it’s become much more progressive,” Kranz told The Coast News. “I think it’s more closely in line with the majority opinion about the values we have as a city. We hear plenty of feedback from people with different perspectives. So, the political system is working.”

Muir said he still keeps an eye on Encinitas politics and believes the council has become too partisan and homogenized under Blakespear. He said he remains a proponent of seating a council that represents a more diverse set of voices.

“Look at all the appointments and commission seats, they’re all Democrats,” Muir said. “I get the parties are extreme, but there are a lot of good people on the right and left.”

As for the district map situation, Muir said it doesn’t really bother him anymore. But he does worry it could happen again to another District 3 candidate.

“I don’t like being a person looking backward. No regrets,” Muir said. “But I hope moving forward they find a way that’s more equitable, independent, logical and makes sense. And not play the games they did with me.”

Afterword

In 2016, a neighborhood organization and resident, backed by Shenkman, sued the City of Santa Monica alleging at-large elections discriminated against Latinos.

A trial court agreed with the plaintiffs but the California 2nd District Court of Appeal reversed the ruling, noting the city’s election system did not violate state or federal laws.

But the case isn’t over. In December 2020, the California Supreme Court granted the plaintiff’s petition for review.

If the state’s high court upholds the reversal, cities that reluctantly made the change to district elections could have a legal basis for returning to at-large.

8 comments

CLMCardiff April 10, 2021 at 2:08 pm

The idea of district voting is flawed. I live in Cardiff, but I have an interest in ALL of Encinitas – New, Old, Leucadia and Olivenhain alike. It’s important for residents to have input that relates to the entire city. The City Council has behaved with cowardice and deception to promote their own agenda, not to represent their citizens. We need to vote them all out. And investigate whether the Brown act was, indeed, violated.

Lorri March 26, 2021 at 6:30 pm

We went to districts because it was that, or get sued in a lawsuit we would not win. I don’t think anyone wanted districts, but a Malibu attorney found something in the law and started suing cities unless they went to districts. Judges backed him up, and we, by law, had to go to districts. The way they were drawn is another story. I think the Coast News recently covered it. At the time, citizens were asked to draw maps of how the districts might geographically work. It was an online site on the city website. The rules did not say you could not be a sitting councilperson, but I know I assumed they would not be a part of drawing the maps. Too much conflict of interest. Citizen 16’s map was chosen. No one knew who Citizen 16 was. I know I assumed it was just a regular citizen. I didn’t think it was the best map, but that’s beside the point. The City Council did, and the districts were drawn. Conveniently each Councilperson lived in their new district, hence the panhandle of Dist. 3 so that Mark Muir could retain his seat. The Coast News did a Calif. Public Records Request and Citizen 16 turned out to be a sitting Council member, Tasha Boerner Horvath. To the best of my knowledge, we are still required to have districts, however, the boundaries could be drawn differently.

Carol Skiljan March 26, 2021 at 12:49 pm

We need to return to at-large voting and make the office of Mayor a four year term. I live in the so-called panhandle or as some of us call it, “north Cardiff.” This exercise in districting is a failure and we should abandon it.

Tom Applegate March 26, 2021 at 8:54 am

District voting has not, does not achieve what the intent was, i.e., to increase minority representation but instead has allowed Cities to create districts along party lines. Why don’t cities dump district voting and return to at-large elections? If challenged legally, fight back, don’t cave; such action would be in the best interest of taxpayers.

Jerome Stocks March 25, 2021 at 11:21 pm

Under general election rules we had Hispanic members of our city council elected by the public. Since we adopted district election it’s Lilly white.
Way to achieve increased diversity said nobody who bothered to look.

Tereasa Conkey March 25, 2021 at 8:00 pm

Mrs. Blakespear and the city Council need to be held accountable for their actions. I feel they are not here to support the city of Encinitas but have their own agenda. I am afraid of them.

Rich Schiavi March 25, 2021 at 1:33 pm

It should not be shocking to see how corrupt this current council is. Total consensus on all issues, no vigorous and healthy debates on issues. Distract and deflect. We might as well just have a Dictator. The others are there just wasting salaries and space.

Regardless of what political party, Mark Muir stood for the residents and was open and supporting of residents.

This council “can’t handle the truth”. They work in a secretive bubble of their own delusions of just wanting to move onto to bigger political arenas. Without question, they all are *using* the residents of Encinitas as mere stepping stones.

It’s shameful Blakespear ran for Mayor knowing full well she would be spending the next 2 years “campaigning” for State Senate using her position as Mayor to do so.

If the effort to districtize Encinitas was to support more “diversity” on the Council, we got the exact opposite. Der Kommissar” Blakespeare’s singular minded, consensus driven koombaya think tank. They ignored the last Council members pick even. The interview process is pretty simple though: “will you say yes to everything I come up with”. If so, you are in. I know, I applied for the role, and the proof is in the actions of this Council.

Crazy thought, if we want more diversity on the Council, maybe support more diverse council members.

zachary March 25, 2021 at 1:00 pm

Coast news is hard to take seriously with the amount of time and articles it does for Mark Muir aka concerned citizen. This kind of agenda setting, for the clear minority in the city, blames everything and anyone for republicans losing elections while ignoring the fact that demographics and opinions have changed since he was on the council. Everywhere in san diego county and southern california has been trending towards democrats for the past decade and shows no signs of reversing because people are not buying the lies and grandstanding of the self serving GOP

Leave a Comment