The Coast News Group
Patti Paniccia, law professor and co-founder of the International Professional Surfers organization, spoke in support of Assemblywoman Tasha Boerner Horvath's new 'equal pay for play' bill during a Feb. 14 press conference in Cardiff. Photo by Jordan P. Ingram
CarlsbadCitiesCommunityCommunityCommunityCommunityCommunityCommunityCommunityCommunityCommunityCommunityDel MarEncinitasEscondidoFeaturedNewsOceansideRancho Santa FeRegionSan MarcosSolana BeachVista

Boerner Horvath introduces ‘equal pay for equal play’

ENCINITAS — Former Encinitas Councilwoman Tasha Boerner Horvath has introduced a bill in the state legislature that would mandate female athletes receive equal prize money for athletic competitions held on state lands. 

State Assemblywoman Boerner Horvath (D-Encinitas) introduced Assembly Bill 467 on Feb. 11, which would require pay equity for female and male competitors as part of the permit and land lease requirements for contests held on state beaches, parks and other resources, potentially impacting hundreds of events statewide, Boerner Horvath said. 

On Thursday, Boerner Horvath, fellow assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez (D-San Diego), and several pioneers in the field of gender pay equity in athletics — including Carlsbad Councilwoman Cori Schumacher — touted the bill in a news conference held in a restaurant across the street from Cardiff State Beach.

On Thursday, Feb. 14, Assemblymember Tasha Boerner Horvath introduced AB 467, a new bill that would require equal pay for women in sports competitions held on public land.
Photo by Jordan P. Ingram

“I really feel when we are on California public lands, I feel that our laws and our legislation has to reflect our values, and those values are equity, equality and inclusion,” Boerner Horvath said. 

Gonzalez, who chairs the state assembly’s select committee on women in the workplace, said that female athletes sometimes slip between the cracks of the discussion on gender pay equity because their workplace isn’t a traditional setting, where such discrimination would not be tolerated in today’s climate. 

“So often when we are doing that we think of traditional workplaces, and we don’t think outside of those lines,” Gonzalez said. “And so when we are talking about the sports industry, those are outside those lines, and ones that are easily dismissed, dismissed by our colleagues, dismissed by the media and by our notions of what equality means. So I think this opens that up to a whole new level of what a workplace is and what serves as equality.”

The new bill would memorialize a decision made in 2018 by the California Coastal Commission and State Lands commission to require prize equity as part of their land lease and permit process.

A group called the “Committee for Equity in Women’s Surfers” successfully lobbied both state agencies to require The Mavericks Challenge, held at Mavericks Beach in Half Moon Bay, to pay female prize winners the same as their male counterparts. 

The speakers on Thursday evoked the legacy of Title IX, the landmark federal law that banned sex-based discrimination in school athletic participation, arguing that the bill was a natural extension of that legacy.

“With Title IX, women felt empowered and started asking, ‘Hey, can I have one of those college scholarships too?'” said Patti Paniccia, a pioneer in women’s big-wave surfing who co-founded the women’s division of the International Professional Surfers organization, and is now a law professor. “But Title IX only applies to school-funded programs. But with Title IX setting the stage and Billie Jean (King) stepping out on the tennis court, we were inspired everywhere, we protested, we met with potential corporate sponsors, we engaged contest promoters, we went to the media telling our story.”

Kim Woozy, founding member of the Women’s Skateboarding Alliance, has spent nearly a decade helping empower women in the sports industry. Woozy spoke in support of AB 467. Photo by Jordan P. Ingram

Female athletes have historically earned a fraction of what their male counterparts earn. In events like big-wave surfing, triathlons and cycling and skateboarding events — often held on public facilities — the discrimination went beyond pay, which was one-tenth of that of males, speakers said.

Female surfers were granted opportunities based on their looks and sponsors often objectified the women.

“Once in response to a newspaper article in which I desperately asked for sponsorship money the only answer I got was from a company called Candy Pants, edible underwear,” Paniccia said. “I turned them down. And I’ll never forget the very first question a report asked us on tour, ‘Have you ever surfed naked?'”

Boerner Horvath said that she believed this bill would expand opportunities for female athletes because they would be assigned equal value to their male counterparts. 

“I think that what we are going to see is more women being involved in athletics, because … how much money we assign something that’s what gives the value to it,” she said. “When two athletes are paid the same amount, and are valued the same amount, then the sponsorships will come. When they are paid with the disparity that was spoken about today, then that reinforces that those sponsorships aren’t as valuable.”

Assemblymember Lorena Gonzalez said the bill may serve as a springboard into broader discussions about equal pay in other athletic fields. Photo by Jordan P. Ingram

When asked if they expected opposition to the bill, Boerner Horvath and Gonzalez said they didn’t expect a public push back, but “behind the scenes,”  maneuvering and questioning of the bill. 

“We see this often when there’s something that has broad public support, because quite frankly, people are afraid to piss off a bunch of women and they should be, because the reality is that corporations and sports conglomerates don’t want to upset a whole host of women who are consumers and are participants,” Gonzalez said. 

Gonzalez said there might be questions as to whether this bill would serve as a springboard into broader discussions about pay in other athletic fields.

“And Tasha and I would say absolutely,” she said. “We are starting with state lands because it makes the most sense, we want to start the conversation because, quite frankly, we would not put up (pay discrimination by gender) in any other field. We would be outraged, and I don’t know why we should accept it for any sport in this state.”

Schumacher, a three-time world champion surfer who championed gender equity in pay and sponsorships in the World Surfing League, echoed the sentiments of her colleagues. 

“I am so deeply grateful to Assemblywomen Boerner Horvath and Gonzalez for believing in this bill, for believing that our stories matter, that gender equity in sports is a worthy cause with far-reaching social impacts,” Schumacher said. 


TomA February 20, 2019 at 6:49 am

Another blow to free markets and capitalism, people vote with their dollars and certain sports and their athletes generate higher interest and therefore more dollars. All the laws in the world won’t force me to watch women’s football but may ultimately end competitive sports for all.

Ron Chambers February 20, 2019 at 6:24 am

Will this apply to the purse money at Del Mar Race Track (he asks tongue in cheek)????

Pete February 20, 2019 at 7:45 am


Pete February 19, 2019 at 10:21 pm

Get those ladies in the gym!

Pete February 19, 2019 at 8:53 pm

Looks like both Horvath and Gonzalez need to get involved in some athletics….

Phil Surtees February 18, 2019 at 11:28 pm

So the truth finally comes out. Women don’t want equal pay for equal work, they want equal pay for having the same job title. Apparently a top lawyer and a bottom of the barrel lawyer should both earn the same amount, because they both do the same amount of work. So … the winner of the men’s final at Wimbledon is the number 1 player in the world, while the winner of the women’s is about number 500, but they should earn the same amount of money. That’s before even mentioning the fact that the men bring more money into the game.
Are these people going to start telling sponsors that they must pay the same amount to all the people they sponsor? I mean, apparently the number 1 tennis player should not earn more than the number 50, so surely it shouldn’t be legal for Nike to pay one athlete more than another if they play the same sport?
The answer is quite simple really. If female athletes are doing the same job as male athletes, then there is no need to have male and female categories. We should just have open sports in which both men and women can play. Then when a female wins the Wimbledon Final she will be paid the same amount that a man would. Problem solved.

Addie February 18, 2019 at 6:34 pm

Your story was very detailed. However, one fact was omitted. it did not mention that Carlsbad Councilwoman Schumacher is in fact, employed by Ms. Boerner – Horvath. One would be “so deeply grateful ” too if it’s the boss speaking…

Comments are closed.