The Coast News Group
Carlsbad Unified
Photo by Steve Puterski
CarlsbadCarlsbad FeaturedCitiesDel MarEncinitasEscondidoNewsOceansideRancho Santa FeSan DiegoSan MarcosSolana BeachVista

State rejects waivers from several North County school districts

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article has been updated to include additional quotes from Superintendent Ben Churchill and Board President Claudine Jones. Additionally, this article includes new information on Dr. Naomi Bardach’s potential conflict of interest.  

CARLSBAD — The California Department of Public Health on March 7 denied several North County school districts’ waivers seeking a return to in-person learning.

The state’s health agency rejected waivers filed by Carlsbad Unified, Poway Unified and San Dieguito Union High school districts.

Approximately two weeks ago, Dr. Wilma Wooten, San Diego County’s public health officer, approved Carlsbad Unified’s safety plan, which was then forwarded to the state. However, Dr. Naomi Bardach, a pediatrician and head of the state’s Safe Schools All Team, refused to approve the plan.

Ben Churchill, superintendent of Carlsbad Unified, relayed the news to parents via an email shortly after the denial.

“This evening I spoke directly with Dr. Naomi Bardach…to appeal this decision,” Churchill’s email read. “She was unwilling to change the ruling. We are reviewing our options and will have an update for families and staff on Monday (March 8).”

The state’s denial letter said Carlsbad Unified’s application was “approved with conditions,” but Churchill noted it amounts to a denial.

Churchill said Bardach told him Carlsbad Unified’s waiver application was denied for two reasons: the district doesn’t have asymptomatic testing protocols in place and the percentage of students on secondary campuses on Jan. 14 was too low.

“I’m shocked, appalled, and grossly frustrated that the (California Department of Public Health) would overrule San Diego County public health officials,” Churchill said. “I reminded Dr. Bardach that we’ve had over 4,000 students on campus since September, with no evidence of school transmissions. As a unified district, we have the same protocols and supports in place at all levels, and we have many months of epidemiological data to show our mitigation strategies work. I also argued that asymptomatic testing has never been a requirement and is not required of any schools currently open. She said the decision was final.”

Additionally, the state claims the district did not meet the following criteria: “An insufficient track record of experience implementing safety protocols and routines, as indicated by small percentages of students being on campus; students have been present intermittently on campus, but for only pilot classes, not ongoing instruction; students have been present intermittently on campus but not for indoor instruction; contact tracing data indicating higher-than-expected numbers of in-school transmissions or outbreaks and/or inadequate remediation actions in response to in-school transmissions or outbreaks; inadequate plan for ongoing safety monitoring using an asymptomatic testing regimen.”

A firestorm erupted on social media following Bardach’s ruling, with a number of parents pointing out that her husband is Jonathan Katzman, chief product officer at Minerva, a remote learning software company, which they say poses a conflict of interest.

Additionally, many think Bardach’s ruling was hypocritical, especially after she wrote an op-ed in The New York Times in August entitled, “Kids Aren’t Big COVID-19 Spreaders. Really.” In the piece, Bardach suggests that high schools are treated “more like adult workplaces” and that “when it comes to elementary school, there are ways to reopen safely for in-person instruction.”

Claudine Jones, president of Carlsbad Unified School District’s board of trustees, said the district and staff worked hard on the plan and believed state approval was “more cursory,” as local officials are more intimately familiar with the school district.

Jones said the district was surprised to learn the state now required a rapid antigen testing protocol.

“We’re extremely disappointed with the ruling by CDPH,” she added. “Our district has demonstrated a measured and safe approach to reopening schools that have always had the safety and health of students and staff as the priorities. As we’ve shown with our elementary schools being back five-days for in-person instruction, the district’s risk mitigation strategies are working.”

The past several months have seen numerous public tussles between the Parent Association of North County San Diego, Carlsbad Unified Teachers Association and the school district’s board of trustees on how to best reopen.

However, all the stakeholders were aligned and signed off on the district’s current safety plan and application, according to Scott Davison, a member of the Parent Association North County.

Davison said the state’s response was sent back with new guidelines not previously communicated to the district, such as the testing requirements.

Additionally, the North County parents’ group filed a lawsuit against the state, with five North County school districts also named as “nominal” defendants. The hearing is scheduled for March 10 and the group is requesting a judge issue an injunction to allow students to return to campus.

“We’re disappointed but not really surprised because it’s par for the course in terms of what we’ve seen from the CDPH making up new reasons to reject schools’ reopening plans and to prevent schools from reopening,” Davison said. “It looks like … they came up with a whole new set of criteria that they decided to apply to these waivers.”


Concerned citizen March 9, 2021 at 10:42 am

Action needs to be taken against SDUHSD board members for their reckless disregard to the safety of their students and staff. Their attempted actions are in violation of state mandates. How many other state regulations are these people willing to bend or break to accomplish their own selfish political goals?

Concerned local March 8, 2021 at 3:11 pm

Many in the Carlsbad community can read between the lines here and understand the repercussions of this political decision. The community is hurting tremendously . . . how is our Assemblymember, Tasha Boerner Horvath, being a leader in this matter? Is she being an advocate for the powerful Teachers Union or our community? Which group is hurting the most by the devastation and fallout of these decisions? Something to remember when Tasha is up for reelection.

Comments are closed.