The Coast News Group
This issue of inclusionary housing has been before the Planning Commission going back to 2017. File photo
Cities Community Encinitas Encinitas Featured News

Encinitas Planning Commission to finalize inclusionary housing resolution

ENCINITAS — The Encinitas Planning Commission is nearly finished with its long discussion about amendments to the city’s municipal code that will have a significant effect on inclusionary housing in the city.

The commission has been working on the resolution for several meetings now but will finalize the wording at the resolution at their next meeting on May 20. Commissioners will eventually recommend the council adopt the resolution.

In a packed meeting this week, the commission ground out more specifics that will increase the inclusionary housing requirement to 50% — 25% for very low income and 25% for low income.

The process has been long, and sometimes controversial, but it appears the commission is prepared to send their recommendation to the Encinitas City Council later this month after some final checks of the draft resolution.

A feasibility study on the proposed amendments was done at the city’s request by Keyser Marston Associates (KMA) and while that study was not as certain in terms of developers’ potential profits, the commission seems satisfied enough.

“There’s been quite a bit of testimony in the past that says 50% is feasible,” Chairman Bruce Ehlers said. “I think we’ve seen two analyses, at least, that says it is feasible. And I have pointed out where the KMA study falls short.”

Paul Marra, a representative from KMA, spoke to their confidence in the study they have done on the resolution.

“We are confident in our methodology, this is our standard approach for this kind of feasibility study,” Marra said. “I’m sorry if the report in some of these various ways is not satisfactory to some of the commissioners but this is our standard method and we do stand by it and we’re confident in our conclusions.”

Commissioner Kevin Doyle, who has done work on some of his own analyses for the inclusionary requirement increase, seems just as confident in his findings that the profit will be there for developers with the increase.

“I think we can make this work. I think a developer who can’t make this work with this many units to play with is not a great developer. This is a gold mine here,” Doyle said. “Our price per square foot is higher than just about anywhere else.”

Ehlers also showed some great frustration with how the process has continued to play out with KMA and city staff. Emails seen as part of records request from the public purport to show city staff working with KMA to try and discredit some of the analysis done by Doyle in support of the resolution.

“I feel like I’m in a one-sided game that if we come up with a good idea and show that it’s feasible and that it’s been done in other cities, I’ve got staff working with KMA to discredit (Commissioner Doyle’s) analysis,” Ehlers said. “Not to look for the truth, not to look for the correct answer but to show that Commissioner Doyle was wrong.”

This general issue of inclusionary housing has been in front of the Planning Commission going back to 2017 and Ehlers seems content that the resolution they will soon send to the Encinitas City Council will achieve what their goal has been from the jump.

“I think it allows us to get the most inclusionary, real affordable housing on the ground,” Ehlers said.

1 comment

Theresa Beauchamp May 13, 2021 at 9:50 am

As an affordable housing advocate, a 50% inclusionary rate would be a dream come true. I have great respect for Planning Commission Chair Ehlers and Commissioner Doyle and appreciate Commissioner Doyle’s dedication to provide analysis of potential profit margin for private developers even at a 50% inclusionary rate. Encinitas residents need to understand what the consequences may be in the case the city adopts a 50% inclusionary rate and the California State Housing and Community Development reject this percentage. My understanding is what Planning Commissioner Dalton has stated at Planning Commission meetings that if The City adopts an inclusionary rate that HCD rejects that we will not only be at risk of lawsuits lodged by HCD but also by local developers that will accuse the city of “taking” private property. Please obtain perspective from State of California Housing and Community Development on a 50% Inclusionary Rate before this issue goes to City Council for a final vote. The City of Encinitas has already spent 2.3 million dollars in lawsuits fro pushing back against Californai State Housing Laws. Granted these state laws are flawed but we still must deal with the consequences of not following them.

Comments are closed.