By Julie Graboi
Maybe you thought that an affordable home was intended for people who didn’t have a lot of money and who wanted to become proud homeowners. That’s what I thought, too. In Encinitas, developers are allowed to build extra density for houses on smaller lots in exchange for reserving a small percentage of units for affordable occupants.
But I recently found out that a single, very-low-income house in the 16-home Desert Rose/Loden density bonus project in Olivenhain was sold for a mere $112,000 to La Jolla-based Scramark LLC owned by Rancho Santa Fe developer David Santistevan. I learned this through a record request with the City of Encinitas.
Lillian Doherty, an attorney and the city’s director of infrastructure and sustainability, referred me to Roy Sapa’u, director of the city’s development services department.
Sapa’u explained that the City was authorized to approve the very-low-income unit to a non-income qualified buyer of the developer’s choosing. The choice was Santistevan’s Scramark LLC, which already owns and manages a number of affordable units in the city and rents these units to low-income families.
According to Sapa’u, “…In the case of the Desert Rose project, the developer chose to sell the unit to a non-income qualified buyer. The City approved the sale, as the non-income qualified buyer already owns and manages two affordable units in the city and has consistently been in good standing with the City’s compliance monitoring.”
According to the June 21 Affordable Housing Agreement for Density Bonus, a qualifying developer of affordable homes is required to prove financial hardship in writing to sell to a non-qualified buyer as stipulated in paragraph 3F of the contract with the City.
A request for a copy of the written proof of developer hardship was not acknowledged, so there is no evidence that this procedure was followed.
A second information request for the list of qualified buyers and investment buyers returned a list of 80 qualified buyers and two investors — or rather, 82 thick black lines, since the names had been redacted. Because the names had been blacked out, there is no evidence if the Scramark LLC had been on the list at all.
When I objected that as a taxpayer-paid benefit, it did not seem appropriate that a Rancho Santa Fe investor should be able to purchase this property for $112,000, including the estimated cost of HOA fees, insurance, and property tax, Marco Gonzalez, attorney for the Desert Rose/Loden developers weighed in.
After denying any involvement in this deal, Gonzalez said, “So, the builder sold the unit to an LLC that owns/manages both market rate and affordable units all over the region. And this is surprising why?”
After that, I wrote to Principal Planner Jennifer Gates and asked for the specific policy on who determines who gets to buy these properties. “We will be looking into options with the City Attorney’s office to develop a policy to bring to City Council for their consideration later this year,” Gates said.
Now we know that the reality in Encinitas is that homes advertised as “affordable” are sold to millionaires of the developer’s choosing.
These investors buy as many of these units as they can and make money off the backs of those who this program was meant to serve by renting investment properties back to low-income tenants who appear excluded from the American dream of owning one of these Encinitas affordable units for themselves.
1 comment
This is unacceptable. The policies for purchase and management of affordable housing must be clearly outlined and delineated for the general public, not just for-profit developers and their attorneys. Existing residents must live in more crowded conditions, must worry about water shortages, and traffic back-ups, non safe evacuation routes, lack of parking, already. But the City of Encinitas’ lack of accountability is astounding to me.
To me, this feels and looks like a classic bait and switch. We are told that reduced setbacks and relaxed building standards with regard to parking, deviations from our General Plan, must be done to provide affordable housing mandated by the State of California. But the reality is that the affordable housing is temporary, and part of a larger for-profit scheme, contrived by developers and their too often snarky, disrespectful attorneys. I support the concept of affordable housing. I do not support deception, lack of accountability and lack of transparency by the City of Encinitas, which seems to excel at passing the buck.
The City could purchase some of these affordable units, directly, and use existing Property Management Services to manage them, in perpetuity. So much money is being wasted on excessive salaries and enormous wages for heads of department. Many of us are very hopeful that a new mayor can be elected next year, who could restore honesty, and accountability through more open government and better leadership.
Comments are closed.