SAN DIEGO — Rady Children’s Hospital will continue to provide so-called “gender-affirming care” for patients under 19 years of age, a judge ruled this week, amid what the medical provider says are escalating threats from the Trump administration to cut off Medicare and Medicaid funding.
After Rady announced last month that it would no longer offer surgeries and other treatments such as puberty blockers, the California Attorney General’s Office sued the provider, alleging that it was ending services unlawfully.
The AG’s Office says that, as a condition of Rady Children’s merger with Children’s Hospital of Orange County and its affiliates, any elimination of such services must be approved by the Attorney General’s Office.
Superior Court Judge Matthew Braner previously ordered that gender-affirming care would resume—except for surgeries—and, after hearing arguments from attorneys on Wednesday, he said his prior order would remain in place.
During Wednesday’s hearing, the judge said that Rady, like other providers potentially under the Trump administration’s microscope, was “between a rock and a hard place.”
However, Braner said he wasn’t convinced that Rady was at immediate risk of losing federal funding and that he saw Rady as being “preemptive” compared to other providers when it came to cutting the practice.
“Right at this moment, I see kids at risk suffering relative degrees of harm. Whereas at the moment, I see the existential threat to Rady of losing funding that would affect 800,000 patients is just that: a threat. It’s a threat that might become a reality, but it is not yet at that stage,” Braner said.
Rady’s attorneys argue that a Dec. 18 declaration from U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. holds that gender-affirming care doesn’t “meet professional recognized standards of health care” and thus places medical providers in danger of losing funding.
Jason Strabo, one of the attorneys representing Rady, told Braner that Rady was at “catastrophic risk” of losing federal funding and that anything perceived as a violation of Kennedy’s Dec. 18 declaration “is potential grounds for exclusion from Medicare or Medicaid coverage.”
But the immediacy of a funding cutoff was disputed by the California Attorney General’s Office, which said that the Department of Health and Human Services has agreed not to send notices to terminate provider agreements until another similar case is decided in federal court in Oregon. That case, which challenges Kennedy’s declaration, is scheduled for a summary judgment hearing on March 19.
Strabo argued that even if California and more than a dozen other states prevail in the Oregon case, the government would immediately appeal and seek a stay of any order, leaving Rady and other providers in continued peril of losing funding.
Should the Dept of Health and Human Services issue a 15-day notice to cut Rady’s funding, Braner said a hearing on the matter would be scheduled within 24 hours.
Braner also scheduled a preliminary injunction hearing in the case for next month.
