The Coast News Group
Community Commentary

Streetscape: The wrong plan for north Highway 101

Most locals agree that the North Coast Highway 101 corridor needs a facelift. 

If they knew the particulars of Leucadia Streetscape, however, it’s doubtful they would choose Streetscape as the best surgery.

With projects like Streetscape, it’s difficult to discern the true agenda. Make no mistake, Streetscape’s purpose is to gentrify and further commercialize the North Coast Highway 101 corridor. The prime mover behind the project is the Leucadia 101 Main Street Association, a group of merchants and commercial real estate owners and developers that is significantly subsidized by the city. Their effort is led by a professional schmoozer who holds a lucrative contract with the city.

As the Streetscape concept progressed, city staff held workshops whose stated purpose was to absorb public input. Many people who attended said the workshops were a charade. Streetscape felt like a done deal, imposed by outside consultants and staffers eager to validate and perpetuate their contracts or jobs. What came out of the workshops were three buzz terms — selling points subsequently used by city staff and Leucadia 101 Main Street personnel to make the project palatable to unsuspecting residents. Those terms are “restore the canopy,” “traffic calming” and “walkability.” All questionable. Let’s look at each.

Restore the Canopy. Streetscape version 4A promises to restore the North Coast Highway 101 tree canopy. The plan calls for removing 21 trees (some heritage size), relocating 56 and adding 847. When the city planted 101 trees to launch the Streetscape project, they were broomstick-diameter saplings. Regardless of how many tiny trees the city plants, several decades will pass before they become a canopy.

Traffic Calming. It has three elements: eliminating one northbound traffic lane, narrowing lanes in both directions and installing five roundabouts along the 2.4 miles from La Costa Avenue to A Street.

Many locals, especially those who live or work west of 101, loudly object to eliminating one northbound traffic lane. Turns from any T intersection onto 101 northbound are already dangerous. Drivers must cross two southbound lanes, often pause where there’s a median, and hope to merge safely into one of the two northbound lanes. Eliminating one northbound lane will make the maneuver more hazardous, especially at peak traffic times.

Traffic engineers claim that narrower lanes slow the traffic. With narrowed lanes, can a huge moving van squeeze past the wide beer truck that stops in the right southbound lane to deliver brews to Papagayo?

If roundabouts are the traffic-calming panacea that traffic engineers and urban planners claim, why does Streetscape cram four of the five in the 8/10 mile between La Costa Avenue and Jupiter Street at the north end of the project? The fifth roundabout is to be at El Portal Street, 1.1 miles south of Jupiter. No doubt, southbound drivers will go slow till they get past Jupiter. Then they’ll speed 6/10 mile to Leucadia Boulevard, another 6/10 mile to El Portal and, once through that roundabout, half a mile to Encinitas Boulevard.

Add this to the mix: All roundabouts except at La Costa Avenue will be virtually the same diameter as the two on Leucadia Boulevard. Southbound drivers will have to squeeze from two lanes to one, accommodate traffic coming from the side street and going to it from the single northbound lane, negotiate the roundabout, and expand to two lanes on the other side.

Also add these points: The city’s consulting traffic engineer estimates that Streetscape will divert 100 vehicle trips per day to Neptune Avenue, 2,000 per day to Vulcan Avenue and 4,000 to 5,000 per day to Interstate 5. Streetscape will maintain some parallel parking on 101, and create new front-in and back-in diagonal parking. The net increase in parking spaces over 2.4 miles will be 38, maybe fewer.

Walkability. Very close car, truck, bus and train traffic makes walking the corridor unpleasant on either side of 101. Streetscape will not change that. Few people will stroll the highway. Leucadia walkers west of 101 use Neptune, La Mesa and La Veta Avenues. Streetscape promoters portray the 101 corridor as a promenade. It’s an unrealistic vision by outsiders bent on imposing a trendy, generic plan on our neighborhood.

Streetscape 4A was approved by a three-vote majority at the Jan. 13, 2010 City Council meeting.

Watching the video at the city’s website is enlightening. It reveals that the then-council’s primary purpose was to facilitate commercial development.

Residents who protested were virtually ignored. Before casting the sole dissenting vote, Councilman Jim Bond characterized bold moves by city officials: “Twenty years down the road, someone says, ‘What the hell were they thinking?’”

Doug Fiske lives west of 101 in Leucadia.



paul May 29, 2013 at 4:47 pm

I have been a Leucadia resident for more than ten years and it is time to implement this streetscape plan without delay. Our community’s main street deserves better than cheap liquor stores, dump motels, drug pushing bars, dilapitated car lots, and depressed businesses. It’s incredible that the old timers in this community want to keep 2 miles of 101 a trashy crap heap! Enough! Get this project done!

ikihi April 24, 2013 at 9:44 am

Just admit it, you just want to keep leucadia crappy.

Nitya Rawal March 31, 2013 at 3:48 pm

I am really concerned about how much traffic is increasing on Neptune and at very high speeds. We walk this street a lot with small children and it’s always been a safe pedestrian friendly street. I propose we get speed bumps and also have those speed signs that check people’s speed so they’re more aware of how fast they are going. Thanks for considering this and perhaps doing another article on this concern.

JP January 27, 2013 at 9:23 am


Isolde January 22, 2013 at 9:46 pm

The city’s engineers measurement of 101 just north of Phoebe St., by Caldwells shop, is only 29.6 feet in width of roadway. In the StreetSCAM CARTOON in the City’s website, they show there being 43 feet of roadway at this exact point of the roadway of 101!HA
Where are they going to get the extra ( 43 – 29.6 = 13.4 ) 13.4 feet that they are depicting in the StreetSCAM?
The median is currently 17.1 feet but in the StreetSCAM it shows it to be 13 feet!
There was a 4 foot non-travel lane going north which is not included in the city’s engineering drawing of the lane-diet!
So, lets see 4.1 feet from the median, 4 feet from the non-travel lane going north, that is 8.1 feet.
So, 8.1 feet created + 29.6 feet existing = 37.7 feet of roadway going south which will be enough to provide for two 11 foot car travel lanes and the 15 feet for the angle parking that the merchants/developers of L101MA want so BADLY to increase their pocket books, regardless of the SAFETY issues that will befall ALL of the people that live in Leucadia, the people that visit our beaches, the people in SD County, and in our great state.

The 7 foot bike lane, as proposed going south, is not going to be built since the SHARROWS are going in, and the 20 feet on the north travel roadway will barely meet the Emergency Vehicle Response MINIMUM requirement.

The FOUR traffic circles, the merging of the one car lane and the bikes at the 4 traffic circles, and the numerous pedestrian cross walks will slow traffic down to a stand still.. This stretch of the roadway will not be an open roadway. It will be just the opposite, blocked w/ interferences everywhere to slow down traffic to a dead crawl, increasing the time that you will SIT, and SIT, and SIT, and SIT in traffic, by 200% in comparison to what it is now! It will have these circular after circular after circular and more circular MAJOR interferences to S-L-O-W the motorist and the bicyclist down, due to plus the HAWK pedestrian crosswalks and the congestion of all the cars in 1 lane versus 2 lanes!

Since $28,000 dollars are going to be spent on the SHARROWS for south 101, now they will not build the dedicated 7 foot Class II Bike Lane going south as promised in the STREETSCAM !

We can keep the two north bound travel lanes, and can still provide for a Class II Bike lane of 6.5 feet by using the 4.1 feet from the median for the north side of the road, and not for angled parking on the south side of the 101 roadway.

Comments are closed.