Council to weigh in on seasonal platform, double tracking, bridge replacement

Council to weigh in on seasonal platform,  double tracking, bridge replacement
Council agreed to submit a letter to the San Diego Association of Governments to voice concerns about a project that will double track the railroad, replace the nearly 100-year-old San Dieguito River Bridge and add a special events platform at the Del Mar Fairgrounds. Photo by Bianca Kaplanek

DEL MAR — Following two presentations at the Nov. 4 meeting on a project that will double track the railroad, replace the nearly 100-year-old San Dieguito River Bridge and add a special events platform at the Del Mar Fairgrounds, council members agreed to send a letter listing their concerns to the San Diego Association of Governments, one of the main agencies involved in the improvements. 

The issues mirror complaints many residents voiced during an open house held at Powerhouse Community Center five days earlier.

The project is essentially a done deal, but City Council and Del Marians are requesting mitigation for any negative impacts it will have on the city, its residents and the recently restored San Dieguito Lagoon.

Linda Culp, project manager from SANDAG, first gave an overview identical to information provided at the earlier open house.

That was followed by a presentation by Bill Michalsky, co-chairman of an ad hoc citizens group formed at the beginning of the year to gain a complete understanding of the project, identify issues and problems and identify and prioritize mitigation measures.

Addressing the double tracking, Michalsky said SANDAG and committee members agree adding a track east of the existing one is the best alternative and positive for lagoon protection. Unresolved issues include increased noise from horns and vibration, as well as visual impacts.

Michalsky said there is little argument the bridge needs to be replaced. The committee is satisfied with the new spans every 56 feet, as opposed to the current 14 feet.

“That would open up the flow considerably,” he said. But members want the height as low as possible. Original plans called for a 10-foot increase. That has been reduced to 8 feet.

He said the special events platform “is really the hottest topic with our committee.” He said members have questioned the 1,000-foot length. “And we don’t think really that we’ve received a good answer.”

There is agreement it should be side-loading. Unresolved issues include a definition of special events, something Culp said she couldn’t provide at this time, usage limits, noise from passengers, as well as arriving, standing and departing trains, lighting, litter, security and services and amenities.

Michalsky said SANDAG representatives agreed to consider a shorter platform, but Culp said North County Transit District and Amtrak both requested the 1,000-foot length. There was also agreement there would be no tickets sales from the platform, lighting and operations would be minimal and there would be an evaluation of mitigations about noise, lighting and visual impacts.

“These are good things,” Michalsky said.

He also said the committee would like some sort of quiet zone established, perhaps similar to the directional one at the Coast Boulevard crossing. He said changes to the tracks and bridge will not be very impactful.

“The key issue is … this platform is something that doesn’t exist in our community today, and it doesn’t serve our community,” he said. “It serves the visitors, and that’s not a bad thing. But we believe it could be taken down in size.”

Several residents weighed in during the public comment period, voicing similar concerns. Some questioned the need for the platform.

“We don’t want to tilt against windmills,” Mayor Terry Sinnott said. “We want to actually have some impact on what is happening in our surrounding area.”

He described the committee issues as “a very good list of items.”

“I think it’s appropriate now … to formally submit these concerns to SANDAG for their consideration and work very, very hard to try to get as many of these mitigation issues resolved and try to figure what we can do for the community.

“We’ve got to really work with SANDAG to try to get some of these mitigations implemented,” he added. “It’s not ending. We will continue putting this together and try to make it as best as possible.”

Council already submitted a letter with similar concerns in February for the environmental impact report.

 

Share

Filed Under: Rancho Santa Fe Featured

Tags:

RSSComments (0)

Trackback URL

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.