We are the 98 percent

The recent $20,000 taxpayer-funded citizen survey predictably showed that 98 percent of residents are happy with their lives in Encinitas. 

I count myself as one of the 98 percent.

I love Encinitas, but I deeply resent the notion that my satisfaction suggests an endorsement of Stocks, Muir and the council majority, and I deeply resent the use of the survey results as a taxpayer-funded campaign ad.

Every four years, Stocks routinely manipulates the mayoral rotation to ensure that he is mayor in his reelection year, and commissions a survey, just before the election, to use as a taxpayer-funded campaign ad. This year, even his cohort on the council, Jim Bond, suggested that the survey be postponed until after the election. Stocks would have none of that.

The recent “sign-gate” fiasco may seem like a sophomoric prank, but it goes deeper than this. It is part of a pattern of self-serving, one-for-you, two-for-me decisions:

- The decision to “creatively” interpret city code as prohibiting the image of Maggie Houlihan on the back of the Arts Alive banners.

- The decision to abuse majority rule to repeatedly deny Councilwoman Teresa Barth her normal turn as mayor, and to use the same mechanism to ensure that Jerome Stocks is always the mayor during his reelection year.

- The decision to abuse majority rule to turn a 3-2 majority into a 4-1 super-majority by appointing political crony, Mark Muir on the tragic passing of Maggie Houlihan,.

- The abuse of majority rule to disproportionately stock the Element Review Advisory Committee with real estate interests resulting in the recommendation of building heights of four to five stories to accommodate future growth.

The list goes on and on.

Service on our city council should be a calling, not a career. Stocks has been there for 12 years. During that time, he has entrenched himself with development interests, both inside and outside the city, who fund his campaigns.

He has passed out and received favors in the form of lucrative appointments to various boards and committees, and in the case of councilman Muir, returned a political favor with a $170,000 pension and a seat on the city council.

My examination of Stocks’ 2008 460 forms shows roughly 2/3 of Stocks’ campaign contributions came from development and real estate interests, and roughly 2/3 came from outside Encinitas.

What interest does a builder in Poway or a land-use attorney in Vista have in Encinitas? Surely not the preservation of our open lands, transparency in government, or the civil conduct of city affairs. Their interests are purely financial — to mine the city for whatever profits they can through continued development, and city contracts.

It’s time for some fresh air in the council chambers. Sixteen years in office is an invitation to subterfuge and good ol’ boy insider money. Let’s not let money win again. To the 98 percent I say, vote like your wonderful life depends on it — because it does. I plan to vote for Lisa Shaffer and Tony Kranz for city council, and urge you to do the same.

Cyrus Kamada is an Encinitas resident.

 

Share

Filed Under: Community Commentary

Tags:

RSSComments (2)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. kathleen2 says:

    Well said ,Cyrus.
    Thank-you
    Kathleen LIndemann

  2. Olivier Canler says:

    Yes, the survey’s timing was deliberately planned to help the incumbents. It is regrettable that it was used to help Mr. Stocks and Mr. Muir, but I can’t say I’m surprised. This is a very desperate maneuver to salvage the incumbent’s campaigns.
    I’m also part of the 98%. I love Encinitas, but I also agree this city council needs some change.
    The survey also reveals that, from an open-ended question, many people have expressed their concerns about growth and are not happy with a dysfunctional council. Petty politics have made a joke of our city’s leadership. It is sad. Yes it is high time for healing, but the chief propagator of the tensions need to be ousted for the healing to begin. The succession of Maggie Houlihan, the general plan update fiasco, the banner sign controversy, and now the political sign controversy are all reminders that a correction is needed. We need an honest and open leadership to put our city back on track and ensure that our future will not be jeopardize by fiscal irresponsibility (more revenue bonds, pension problems being brushed under the carpet), and intrusive real estate developments. On this subject, the public workshop results includes pages of comments from residents that just want to keep Encinitas the way it is, and are very worried about what future developments could bring to our town.

    Stay tune for the Dec 12th council meeting where the ERAC will present its plan that include 6 recommendations, with one of them suggesting the R45 zoning (45 units per acre) and 5 story tall buildings will be ok in Encinitas. Encinitas residents and council should never adopt such a recommendation. In fact in the public workshop, high density was the least favorite tool selected by the survey participants.

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.