City puts clamps on cell phone towers

OCEANSIDE — City Council unanimously approved an urgency ordinance that will put restrictions on wireless communication facilities, satellite dishes and antennas on Oct. 20.
“It’s a great first step,” Holly Hargett, telecommunications committee member, said. “It’s absolutely where they need to go. The previous guidelines were outdated 13 years.”
New guidelines pinpoint preference areas for cell phone tower placement in city-owned, industrial and commercial property before towers are put in public, open space, agricultural or residential areas. “We want them to co-locate,” Jerry Hittleman, city planner, said. “If the applicant wants to place antennas on a commercial building they must prove the need of the facility.”
While the ordinance is a step in the right direction, many residents are still concerned about present towers that loom over schools and churches that are outside of residential zones.
“I don’t want to sit in a classroom with a cell phone tower over my head,” Chris Tucker, a student at Hillside Academy, said. “The radiation causes brain cancer, plenty of doctors think so.”
“Members of my family, including my daughter, have been made quite ill by these structures,” Tom Allen, an Oceanside resident, said. “Article 39 is a sensible first step.”
To comply with current laws the ordinance cannot prohibit telecommunication services in specific areas, still residents urged council to consider potential health risks of cell phone tower radiation.
“You are the safeguard in the city,” Connie Chapman, an Oceanside resident, said. “I am a mother. I like my cell phone, but I love my family.”
The ordinance provides for cell phone towers to be set back from residential areas the height of the tower plus 10 feet, and calls for towers to be camouflaged from view.
It is also requires amateur radio antenna to be limited to 36 feet, or 10 feet above building height.
Additional recommendations were made that a monetary penalty be charged to communication facilities after conditional use permits expire, and ham radio operators pay a reduced fee for conditional use permits. “Hopefully we can look at them (additional recommendations) further down the road,” Hargett said.
There was strong objection from ham radio operators about being regulated under the same ordinance as commercial service providers.
“We’re two diverse groups being covered with one ordinance,” Dennis Parker, an Oceanside resident, said. “We’re totally diverse operations.”
“It mixes nonprofit with for-profit carriers, something’s wrong,” Fred Ashley, an Oceanside ham radio operator, said.
Because of significant public objection to inclusion of amateur radio in the ordinance, city staff will report back Jan. 5 on modifications for ham radio operator requirements.


Filed Under: NewsRancho Santa Fe NewsThe Coast News


RSSComments (11)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. Lawrence 9H1AV says:

    This is sheer madness. How about shutting all radio and television stations that use very high power? How about not using your cell phones because you get more radiation in your brain since you hold the cell phone to your ear while the antennas on towers are much further away. Radio amateurs are limited in power and operate intermittently not like commercial radio and TV stations who operate continuously with very high power. Radio Amateurs are non-profit and provide an excellent service to the community. When you are in an emergency you will have no one to help you because cell phones and internet will be the first to go while radio amateurs can provide emergency communications at all times and for as long as they are needed. This has been proved time and time again all over the world so stop being hysterical about radio amateurs and exempt them from any restrictions. This is apart from the stupid idea of limiting the height of aerials/antennas because the nearer they will be the stronger will be the field strength and the more you will be exposed to any radiation. Anyway, you cannot go against the FCC and if you go on with your ordinance you will be faced with costly litigation and you are going to lose your case.

Leave a Reply

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.