Comments on: Husband’s cancer spurs wife to warn of suspected cell phone dangers

By: Lloyd Burrell

Lloyd Burrell — Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:24:42 +0000

My heart goes out to you Ellie. Cell phones are deadly devices. I have been suffering from electrosensitivity for the past 8 years, brought on by cell phone use. I didn’t need a doctor or scientist to tell me what the cause was, it was so obvious. I was lucky I never got a tumor or cancer, but my illness transformed my life, see http://electricsense.com. There is so much you can do to protect yourself, and your children at a personal level.

By: delightful

delightful — Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:32:00 +0000

Hi Susan,
I sent U an email a few days ago but am concerned it might have gone to spam. It’s from Btrfly:)

By: Susan & Ellie

Susan & Ellie — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 03:28:30 +0000

"Delightful" may contact Susan with a story at susan.foster1004@cox.net or Ellie at emarks@apr.com.
"Frank1970" has a very good point — there are many professions whose employees come in close proximity to antennas and towers and there is no requirement to warn of the hazards of RF radiation. We suggest you write to your unions and ask that hazard signs be posted. Who would like to stand in front of an unshielded microwave oven and work? It defies logic.
To "Paniolo", use a wired earpiece that goes from the phone to your ear. Not Bluetooth except for short calls and then take it off your ear. It is constantly emitting & receiving RF radiation when on. For a list of radiation emissions by brand, go on this website: Ewg.org and hit link ‘Cell Phone Radiation Report’.
Susan & Ellie

By: Paniolo

Paniolo — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:19:29 +0000

For Susan and Ellie:
Is there information available that discloses which phones, locations, carriers carry the most risks? Does an earpiece reduce the risk ?
I think I need this type of info quickly as I’ve been a big cphone user for 20 years.
Tyou

By: Frank1970

Frank1970 — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:10:50 +0000

My sympathies to Ellie and her husband as well as sincere thanks for their dedication and efforts.

Another group of victims includes all workers (roofers, painters, electricians and others) whose jobs require that they work in front of and close to wireless RF transmitting antennas that are everywhere today.

This short video describes the problem:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC-FrpA9-zs

By: Delightful

Delightful — Sun, 11 Jul 2010 02:37:01 +0000

Is it possible to get in touch with one of these lady’s as I also have a story concerning this of my own?

By: anonymous

anonymous — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:47:16 +0000

In response to Ray Yargeau’s question about the cell equipment on top of the Coast News offices, assessment of the intensity of each tower must be done on a site by site basis. The distance outward from a cell tower creates the ‘zone of RF impact’. RF exposures around antennas can vary widely. My experience has been the cell-siting companies grossly underestimate the potential for hazard from the sites. Health does not concern them. Getting the deal closed is what they get paid for.
Susan Foster

By: Ray Yargeau

Ray Yargeau — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 22:41:08 +0000

Very interesting, and frightening, article.
Should we be concerned about the cell equipment
sitting on top of your offices on Highway 101?