Comments on: COMMUNITY COMMENTARY: Confusion reigns at Hall park meeting

By: Unbevievable

Unbevievable — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:42:55 +0000

Earlier today the city changed the description of the project and stated that there were tennis courts. There are not tennis courts planned. They do not exist of any map.
Then that was changed again. Basketball courts were put into the description and tennis courts were omitted. There are no tennis courts on any proposal maps. They are doing this to try to pretend that this is a Community Park. That is what the community wanted, tennis courts and basketball courts.
The current park plan is a Special Use Park and there are no tennis courts or basketball courts in the plan.

By: What is going on?

What is going on? — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:54:12 +0000

They altered it AGAIN.

By: More Deception ll

More Deception ll — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:08:52 +0000

This was the second time the city has altered this document.
How many times are they going to alter documents of record?

By: More Deception

More Deception — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:57:43 +0000

The city changed the original CPP document to say that the EIR was approved and certified, "…by the Planning Department and/or the City Council.
Fact: The Planning Department DID NOT APPROVE OR CERTIFY THE EIR. The Planning departments findings were rejected by City Council.
They did not notify anyone of these changes to this legal document.

By: More Obfuscation

More Obfuscation — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:31:24 +0000

The city has not contacted people who had questions from this meeting. They are available if you go to the planning department and if you knew this was happening. Still, no answers to questions submitted concerning the General Plan,Zoning Changes or anything other than lights.
"Any questions or comments which were outside the scope of the proposed lighting project CPP
(specifically in regards to athletic field lighting), but rather specific to the CPP process or planning, are excluded from this final report and will be directed to Planning staff."
This is not an open and fair CPP process. If this was anyone other than the city presenting this CPP, they would be required to follow the rules.

By: More Misinformation

More Misinformation — Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:07:16 +0000

The city updated the Hall Property information on their website. The CPP notice document that is presented as to what was sent out is not the CPP notice that was actually sent out. It has been changed and is now being represented as the actual original document. That is not true.

By: Best option

Best option — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:46:09 +0000

It sure seems like the best option would be to hold off this general plan change for now and get the park built. Then we can see what kind of impact the operational park has on the entire community. At that point, the entire community can decide if we want the stadium lights, and consider if the additional night time hours issues can be tolerable.