<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surf contest location controversy heats up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecoastnews.com/2009/11/surf-contest-location-controversy-heats-up/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecoastnews.com/2009/11/surf-contest-location-controversy-heats-up/</link>
	<description>Making Waves in Your Neighborhood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TanyaBrooking</title>
		<link>http://thecoastnews.com/2009/11/surf-contest-location-controversy-heats-up/comment-page-1/#comment-6932</link>
		<dc:creator>TanyaBrooking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecoastnews.com/?p=39148#comment-6932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your article title is more than a little mis-leading, Wehtahnah.  Where exactly is the &quot;controversy&quot;?  You barely MENTION the grassroots backlash against the commercialization of Swami&#039;s or the reasons for that backlash (i.e. environmental impact to a fragile ecosystem, increase in traffic/noise/garbage, the lack of transparency of this whole process, the potential of opening the door for numerous additional surf contests, etc. etc.)  How about a TWO-sided article on this &quot;controversy&quot;, instead of a blatant endorsement of the contest?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article title is more than a little mis-leading, Wehtahnah.  Where exactly is the &#8220;controversy&#8221;?  You barely MENTION the grassroots backlash against the commercialization of Swami&#8217;s or the reasons for that backlash (i.e. environmental impact to a fragile ecosystem, increase in traffic/noise/garbage, the lack of transparency of this whole process, the potential of opening the door for numerous additional surf contests, etc. etc.)  How about a TWO-sided article on this &#8220;controversy&#8221;, instead of a blatant endorsement of the contest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 319/348 objects using apc

Served from: thecoastnews.com @ 2013-05-24 03:42:20 -->